Review:
What is set at the top of the world
and has more drama than Keeping Up With the Kardashians? Into
Thin Air is Jon Krakauer’s account of the tragic 1996 climbing season on
Mt. Everest. Krakauer chronicles in
great detail the interaction between the personalities of expedition members,
intense environmental conditions, and the grueling physical exertion that
characterizes expedition climbing. His retelling of the events that led to the
deaths of eight climbers, reveals his ambivalence about the role that he and
other members played in the loss of life and the permanent damage that this
expedition inflicted upon those climbers that survived. Set in the Himalaya, predominantly on Mount
Everest, this story is part adventure travel narrative, part climbing textbook,
and part psychological thriller.
Krakauer uses this forum to analyze the events of the 1996 Everest
disaster in hindsight, seeking to ascertain how so many lives were lost, his
role in the loss of life, and how mountaineering is both a pursuit of the
divine as well as a highly flawed and damaging activity that destroys human
life as well as the environment.
Much of Into Thin Air is a tribute
to the sport of mountaineering. In his
depiction of mountaineering, Krakauer claims “that climbing Mount Everest was
primarily about enduring pain …and in subjecting ourselves to week after week
of toil, tedium, and suffering, it struck me that most of us were probably
seeking, above all else, something like a state of grace” (Krakauer 140). Krakauer describes the process of climbing,
the technical climbing gear, and psychology of climbing in great detail. His devotion to and experience with the sport
is engaging and creates a feeling of religious practice. He loves the mountains and describes the
beauty of Mount Everest and the surrounding Himalaya with a naturalist’s
eye. Also with a commitment to detail,
he gives background information about the local Sherpa culture in order to
reveal the book’s setting and some of the characters. Krakauer explores the external
characteristics and internal motivations of the other climbers on Everest. Such attention to detail is riveting if not
problematic.
Yet, Krakauer’s account of the 1996
expeditions and their members is also damaged by his own personal feelings
about the event. Krakauer claims that
“of course for some Everesters myriad other, less virtuous, motives came into
play, as well, minor celebrity, career advancement, ego massage, ordinary bragging
rights, filthy lucre” (Krakauer 140). He criticizes the commercialization of
Everest, the selfish motivations of his fellow climbers and their lack of
experience, the ego-driven decisions of his guides, and what he seems to think
is the simpleness of the Sherpas. He is
judgmental and does not seem to understand his role in the events of the
expedition though he tries to explain himself in the epilogue. Though Krakauer reflects deeply on others, he
does not seem to reflect on himself. He
does not seem to see that the criticism that he has for his fellow climbers
accurately describes him. An example is
that he condemns the commercialization of Everest yet he is a journalist whose
story intent was to brings more climbers to Everest. His harsh criticism hurts and angers those
climbers who survived and damages the reputations and memories of those who
died. The anger, petty quarreling, and
finger pointing of the narrative reads, at times, like reality T.V.
This book is powerful for it’s
analysis of a high profile event, its armchair adventure on the slopes of
Everest, and its deep look at the psyche of climbers in some of the most
extreme conditions in the world. Whether
you are glad you are not there or you wish your next hike was the beginning of
the road to the summit of Everest, Into
Thin Air is worth the vicarious exhilaration and sadness that reading it
evokes.
This review made me more inclined to read Into Thin Air, because I have read other books by Jon Krakauer and his intense writing style really draws in the reader. the word choice you used and examples you brought up made the story seem much more intriguing than the title.
ReplyDelete